Point Park Globe

America wants gun control, so why don’t we have it?

Big money is to blame for lack of new gun control laws and regulations

Written By Matt Petras

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






It’s not often you see a stadium full of people on cable television applaud someone insisting a politician refuse donations from a powerful political group in America. That, however, is exactly what happened during a recent CNN town hall following the Parkland High School shooting.

While the push for reasonable gun control legislation is an uphill battle, the survivors of the shooting are doing a great job in illuminating what I’d say is the biggest issue behind the vicious trend of gun violence in America. The fact of the matter is the influence of money is the most substantial political issue facing America, and examining the lack of government action despite the trend of gun violence is perhaps that fact’s most obvious consequence.

Almost every American wants universal background checks, for example, and that isn’t just a platitude – it’s a fact. “Support for universal background checks is itself almost universal,” according to Feb. 20 Quinnipiac polling. “97-2 percent, including 97-3 percent among gun owners.” Additionally, 83-14 percent support mandatory waiting periods for gun purchases and 67-29 percent favor a ban on selling assault weapons, according to the polling.

When considering 67 percent, it isn’t an overwhelming majority, but 83 is, and 97 most assuredly is. So, if the American people want these policies, why don’t we get them? The answer is simple – money. The gun industry doesn’t want fewer guns in the country, it wants more, because that means more money.

In America, the agenda of the wealthiest groups and individuals has substantially more of an impact than that of ordinary people. A joint 2014 study by Princeton and Cambridge Universities beared this out empirically by analyzing perspectives on political issues from various groups and individuals, including regular folks and special interest groups with lots of money behind them.

“Despite the seemingly strong empirical support in previous studies for theories of majoritarian democracy,” according to the study. “Our analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts.”

Bernie Sanders, now one of the most prominent and influential congressmen  in the country, is the one politician who can be relied on to point out the wealthy few have such great power over the rest of us – the Vermont senator can often be heard calling the American government an oligarchy, steered by a wealthy few rather than the masses.

Unfortunately, while Sanders has consistently supported some good gun control measures, such as a ban on the sale of assault rifles, he disappoints in taking on the gun industry as viciously as he takes on, say, the fossil fuel and pharmaceutical industries.

He never discusses guns with the same ferocity and frequency as he does with issues like health care and climate change. For the most part, Sanders brings up guns when forced to defend murky votes and stances he’s taken over the years on issues like gun manufacturer liability.

These high schoolers who survived the Parkland shooting, then, are the most cogent voices of both sense and righteous outrage on the gun issue in the mainstream public sphere.

Perhaps the best take was from high school student Sarah Chadwick, one of the survivors of the Parkland shooting who wrote the following in a viral tweet: “We should change the names of AR-15s to ‘Marco Rubio’ because they are so easy to buy.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 Comment

One Response to “America wants gun control, so why don’t we have it?”

  1. Mauricio on March 22nd, 2018 3:22 am

    To start Susan you failed to address the statement that “Those who wish to cause harm will find a means of doing so. which shows only a hatred for guns and not for unnecessary deaths. In Australia there was a growing hatred for gun deaths in the country after nearly 150 people were killed in the years running up to 1996. When 37 people were killed they decided enough was enough and they placed a ban on semi-automatic rifles and shotguns. While there is growing hatred for gun deaths in the US, it is not at a point where the majority of the population will support a massive gun ban. In Japan after the imperialist age ended in Japanese defeat in ww2 the country adopted a pacifist view. No one was supposed to have guns. The first guns were introduced for the police when the US (which was basically ruling the country) started requiring the police to have guns. Slowly people became allowed to own guns but only after major background checks. In both of these countries it is important to understand that guns were never a part of their identity and they have nothing anything like the 2nd amendment so the majority of citizens did not feel they were being striped of rights.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left